Motivation and Scripted material
On Monday we were given some articles to read one was Assessing Motivation to Read.
You may want to take a look at the article for these questions.
1. Lets say you administer the motivation to read profile and you now know the motivation level of the student is low. When you begin changing things to motivate this student how do make sure that you aren’t simply:
a. Changing the requirements for required work?
b. Lowering the level of difficulty and not challenging their potential?
An example given in the article was: (If a child indicates on the survey that “reading is very hard” and that “reading is boring,” the teacher can suggest books of particular interest to the child that the child can read with ease. Pg 530)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The motivation to read survey is designed to “initiate an informal, conversational exchange between the teacher and the student.”(pg 525) This section goes on describe how these interviews are social events that provide depth and valuable information. The conversational interviews are scripted but it’s recommended that the teacher deviate from the script in order to “glean information” that could otherwise be missed. So here’s the question.
2. Schools using scripted lessons are becoming more and more common.
a. Do you think the reasons the article lists for a teacher not to follow the script while
b. That they don’t provide depth, glean information, elicit insight and that they may miss
information?
c. Does a teacher interact and work with the student for their benefit while conducting an
interview in some of the same ways they would teaching a lesson?
d. Can we really compare these two things (conducting a motivation interview from a
script and teaching a scripted lesson)?